The Theory of Social Acceptance

Chapter 1:An Introduction to this Blog:-

In my previous blogs I had quoted a term "THE THEORY OF SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE", and I have also mentioned that it is a philosophical theoretical idea that came out of my mind due to frustration, but in the previous blogs it plays as a small topic because the purpose of that blog is different i.e. the topic is not about this theory but everything in this universe is inter-connected to each other. While I was writing about something in some blog on some topic I was forced by my subconscious mind to use this theory as an example because in some or other way it is relevant and inter-connected to the topic, i didn't elaborated the whole theory i gave a short explanation to 'THE THEORY OF SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE' with example directly or indirectly connected to the main thesis or concept of the blog. On that day in oath to myself that i'll write complete blog on 'THE THEORY OF SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE', explaining the whole concept. As I always used to say in philosophy nothing is new, you might find this theory similar to any other theory which i'm may not exposed to, I will appreciate if you bring that work to my notice, it will be very helpful for my works in future.

You may wonder why i stated that in philosophy nothing is new? I'm here to clarify it, my clarification would be easy to understand if i quote it with a situation. For an example you are going through some kind of situation, you read some philosophy and you started discovering some kind of theory, that you believe is new to this world, after all you go and search about something, you read a new topic which is very similar to your new philosophical idea. Now you will wonder who quoted the theory and started researching about it, the result is someone from the 4th century in another corner of the world thought as same as you, isn't it interesting that many humans thinks in a same way. Before Charles Fourier coined feminism, many people felt the same as him, but he is the first person to draft it as an official content, he is the first person make the idea popular, who quoted a term for the idea. 

There is nothing to feel pathetic about these kind of experiences, this is common in all theoretically based fields especially in philosophy.

The purpose of this blog is to explore the depth of my philosophical idea "THE THEORY OF SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE". 

In this blog we'll see; how I got this idea, the pros and cons, and many more.

Before going in depth I want to ensure that you are aware that this whole concept is my own philosophical idea, which perhaps consciously or subconsciously have influence of many other philosophers.

You may like my theory or you may oppose my theory, if you oppose my theory comment in this blog or mail me or the better option is message me in Instagram. We can have a debate because I believe that debating leads to many discoveries, if you comment one may oppose your theory, another may have some changes and all will learn some new perspective.

I don't want to make this introduction any long because this generation is filled with people with less attention span and less patience. So let'us dive into "THE THEORY OF SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE".

I begen this blog with the chapter which explains how I came up with this theory of SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE.

Chapter 2:How i came up with this Theory:-

Every theory is a cause of a person's experience and learning throughout his life, perhaps the theory is aftermath of a traumatic experience in life. Indeed like other theories, my theory is also has a cause of my experience, learning, analysation, observation, reading, study and understanding about this world.

I hope most of you are familiar with one of my previous blog about atheism. As a matter of a fact, i came up with the theory while i was writing the blog. These chapter focuses on what made me quote the theory.

Unlike other animals, humans has a peculiar feature i.e. we all wants to gain acceptance from other humans, we all beg for recognition, but there are people who are not recognised during their lifetime, but celebrated long after their dead, most of them were artist, i always believes that artist are the people mostly craves for recognition, but artist like Frans Kafka, Nietzsche, especially the GOAT Vincent Willem Van Gogh, there are only few people who like him for his paintings, most of the people started liking him after studying his life, in his life he is not accepted nor recognised by the society, he literally lived a life full of trauma, no human can live like him, he is always regarded as the greatest of all time.

I am observed many humans in schools, walkways, parks, everywhere. The fact is that i mostly got this idea by studying the behaviour of schoolmates. Basically i am an observant type of person, i observe everything that happens around me, i think my observation helps me in my writing and philosophical thinking. The fact is in highschool, all of the students are in adolescent period, basically most of the teenagers shows interest in gaining acceptance and there is nothing to blame it's the nature of teenagers. In order to gain this acceptance, people started behaving in a different way that they may dislike but they bahave in this way because thay wants acceptance from other people, to gain this acceptance they completely change their personality, few may naturally has the qualities but their are few who develops bad personality which they consider as a seductive bahaviour but the fact is this behaviour is not seductive, there are also few people who cracked the code. You know when a person is really beautiful, when they being themselves, you know when a person is consider as not beautiful, when they act in order to gain social acceptance.

Social acceptance is not meant to be a depreciating practice always, in some cases it acts as a socializing technique, which is helpful for many people until they divert their positive behaviour progress to a depreciating lifestyle. We will also tak about the postive impact of the practice 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE'.

My class is a noisy class, there are students in our school with depreciating behaviour, one day while i am observing i got frustrated because many of the people act in order to gain other's acceptance, most of them are not really being themselves that's what made me so frustrated, if we humans go on like this, these practice may lead to extinction of virtuous society. Our society is already at the verge of extinction.

As i always says we should have a clarity of which is right and wrong. Buddha says that if you live with desires you should also should be ready to face the consequences of losing it so throw all the desires. But the fact is we human beings can't live without desires, but we can change what we desire for, i'm planning to post a seperate blog on desire. 

As i said i got frustrated by my environment in school, i have an obsession on this society, i have an anger on the people, i think i need to change these people. 

The frustration, the anger, the obsession impacted my philosophical ideology and i came up with this philosophical theory.

I can't able to find a better place than writing to express my anger and frustration through philosophical ideologies. These whole theories are the aftermath of the frustration and anger towards society. 

We humans has a bad habit that we think that we are the centre of the world, we didn't realize that we are part of this system or society.

I personally thinks that everyone should be like what I want them to be, but I end up disappointed. Later I realised that every human out in this world is in different types, and that what makes this universe interesting, but there are people who stop losing their character and virtue in order gain social acceptance. 

I myself witnesses many events which I'll mention in following chapter.

The curious minds of the readers will be fed up in the following chapters, in next chapter we'll discuss in detail about the theory of social acceptance.

 

Chapter 3: About the 'THEORY OF SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE':-

In my previous blogs and sub-blog topics, I have explained a bit about "THE THEORY OF SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE". This chapter is a complete idea of my theory "THE THEORY OF SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE"

The short and basic definition of this theory is when a human changes himself to an undesirable character in his life, in order to gain acceptance from other people, which is considered to be a social norm or a technique to socialize with others, when this practice reaches the limitations in negative sense it leads to virtuous extinction of humanity. 

If you join a new school, there some habit is a social norm, but it is against your belief, but as a teenager you desire for other's acceptance, you have only one option to gain others acceptance is to develop the social norm as a habit, whether it is against you're belief or not.

My theory proposes that when a person is new to a society in order gain others acceptance, we may lose ourselves, but 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE' not intended to be a negative practice there is also benefits of this when we practise it in a proper way, when it is practiced in a wrong way it may destroy you. Most of the people in this world desire for others acceptance, from our childhood as a whole society we brought up in a way where the approval of other people matters especially in a country like India we mostly matters other people's thoughts more than our own happiness, there are also people who cracked this code, but like one coin has two sides, there are also people who get deviated because of this practice.

I already stated in my previous blog on atheism that most of the people follows religion without feeling the divinity, they follows it for social acceptance, when we analyse people deeply we will able to come to this conclusion. The theory I produced before is based on my perspective and observation. There are many deep thinkers like Dostoevsky, Nietzsche, Tolstoy, Sigmund Freud, and many more people saw and analysed the world and people in different way, for the analysis we need to think deeply. 

I always used to question everything around me, one day a question raised in my mind: why people follow religion? did they felt the divinity in them or they follow it for some other reason? To get the answer, i analysed every human around me, i thought deeply, i go on thinking about it. I came to a conclusion by my research, that they follow religion in order gain others acceptance, my second assumption is that from thier childhood their parents or the society as a whole alter their way of thinking by feeding them the knowledge of only one religion and praising it, and you may ask what is the way to make a child choose the path in spritual journey, the answer is simple leave the child free, let him/her choose what to follow, you should let the child to read all philosophies, and let the child understand everything and choose what he/she likes to.

During this research i am able to connect the theory to all people around me, by this research i realized how the 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE' may backfire the society in a negative sense, how the consequences of this practice lead to virtuous extinction in humanity.

As i stated before the practice of 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE' may result as a  good technique to socialize with people until it reaches it's limits. You may wonder what are it's limits? The limit are when you started losing yourself, when you started changing your personality which was considered as undesirable by yourself in your past, but now you started becoming it, when your wisdoms from the past is damaged by these practice this is also considered as a limit for this practice of 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE',. When these limits are violated by the wrong way of the practice of 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE' it may lead to the virtuous extinction of humanity, it may lead to shortage of creative persons in this society, it may lead to shortage of unique thinkers, it may also lead to extinction of new philosophical thinkers to this society, we need to realize the serious consequences of the bad way of the practice of 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE'.

As i stated already people desire for acceptance. For an example there is a student highly devoted to his/her school books, good at sports, a theist, he/she follows all of this in order to get others acceptance, wants to get good marks, what to be perfect in everything in order to gain others acceptance, but he/she doesn't do it because they like it, they follow these things because these perfection is liked by other, it gain them some kind of acceptance from other people, if he/she do these things because they really likes to do it, they love the process of doing it, it is highly appreciated by me, if they become a theist because they felt the divinity in their inner soul, these practice is highly acceptable, if they does these activities in order to gain acceptance from other people. I encourage every person to read different things, learn diffrent philosophies, whether it is tough to read, trey to fell the philosophy or any concept, read all genre, develop your knowledge, develop your own concept, understand life, question everything, try to find the answer for your question, take a inner journey, understand yourself, don't stereotype anything before understanding the whole concept, don't rebel against the system before understanding it, accept the fact that we all going to die one day, in your lifetime perish in attempting the great and  impossible, accept the uncertainty of life, all focuses on exploring the world outside which is beyond our control rather i prefer to explore the world inside my material body, which is under my control, focus on things which is under your control, don't ever try to control the world which is beyond your control, led life goes on a flow, anything happens life is to move on, live with the uncertainty, the fact is we humans are can't live without desires, desires are like fuel for purposeless life, desires assures our existence of soul and conscientious, but when we have desires we should also be ready to face the consequences of not having the desired things in life, that means losing it, but we can change the way we desire, our desires should rely on process rather then the result, rather than desiring for winning the game we can desire for playing the game, i surely recommend this practice, you may find it very tough to adopt to this practice, but once you adopt it, it is a very effective practice. 

There is a quote by Carl Jung which goes like this "Who looks outside, dreams; who looks within, awakens." This quote emphasis the importance inner journey or can be termed as spritual journey, i think the most appropriate words to use is introspecting our inner self for personal happiness, when you looks within you, you gets clarity about life, about yourself, you get to know about your powers and talents, while you are in this journey people may quote you as a 'loser' or term you as 'a failure', don't listen to them do what your inner self says, if you listen to them and started following their words for gaining the acceptance from the society, you lose yourself, your happiness, you may doing something which is not liked by you, which you didn't desire for in your past, you are now depressed, you became the victim of the practice 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE'. You may resonate this theory with your own life. We need to realize that we all are in a pathetic situation, but the fact is for individuals with self awareness this practice of 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE' acts as a tool for socializing with others, that's what we going to see in the following chapters.

The curious minds of the readers will be fed up in the following chapters, in next chapter we'll discuss about the significance and insignificance of the practice of 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE'.

 

 

Chapter 4: The Significance & Insignificance of 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE':-

In the previous chapter i have proposed THE THEORY OF SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE, i also stated that the practice of 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE' has both advantages and disadvantages, it depends upon us to make it an advantage or disadvantage, it depends upon the way we use it. 

From the starting of this blog I insisted that the practice of 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE" not meant to be a negative practice all the time, it can also act as a good technique to socialize with other humans. I insisted it over and over because when I proposed a hint about this theory in my previous blogs, I mostly handled it as a negative practice. 

I am a person who sees everything in various perspectives, there is a quote which goes like this "One person's protagonist is another person's antagonist" these is one the best quote about perspective, one person may seem to you a good fella but if you ask about him to any other person they may share a contrasting opinion about that person these is known as perspective. 

The practice of seeking SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE will help you in socializing with other people until it crosses the limit. For an example you are new to this school, you want to make friends in this new school,'cause you are a person who always wanted to make new friends, but this people didn't accept you because you are little unique from them, sooner you learnt to gain the acceptance of them, you need to develop a interest in few things, sooner you started socializing with others. In these kinds of situations the practice of 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE' acts as a technique to socialize with others, when we ee it in this kind of perspective it seems a profitable technique. As i always says perspective changes from person to person, from situation to situation, in the first scenario i mentioned the situation is different, in that situation in that situation the act may seems a perfect thing to do, but when the situation changes rather tahn understanding the scenario you chose to do something which perhaps a wrong move. If we all become a victim of the wrong way of practicing 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE' the world becomes boring, if everything a person does becomes a sin, how do we qualify as humans, leave let the man be himself, people are scared because they beleive their sins reflects in their reincarnation, that's a lie. I recently read a book on reincarnation this name of the book is "Coming Back:,a science of reincarnation by A.C.Prubhupada" in that book the author stated the belief of different philosophers and few religious belief, by analysing the book i learnt that people who are suffering ion this life made to believe that if they follow what the religion consider as 'sin' they may punished by god in the next life, people are made top believe this because people are very concerned about their next life so the religion can implement anythings into them, they literally made the people depend on the religious people, if a person speaks against the religious belief people are tribulated by the other people, humanity died when Bruno is killed. The religion use the wrong way of practicing 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE' in order to control other people. People are not allowed to write, speak, or even think something against the religious belief, this may not apply for all religion it will apply for specific religion in specific period of time. The religion's founder may suggesting people to live united and with freedom but the people may understood in a way wrong, if everyone follows and thinks in the same way the world becomes boring. Mortality is a myth created by the people in order to control other people, whatever the person does against the religious belief is considered as sin, in the name of sin the religion is altering the people mental state. If a theory which maybe scientifically correct but it is against the belief of the religion, the person loses his/her 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE' but there are also people who does what they like but at last they tribulated by other people. I think that the religion uses these techniques to manipulate others, and I used to wonder what's the use of manipulating others, everyone from the so-called higher hierarchy people always wanted others to follow what they believe, for manipulating other they use the so-called man made gods, people are failed to fell the divinity inside them, when everything we does becomes sins what's the use of being human being, every person is unique in their own way, leave the people let them think on their own and understand the world around them. People from that time their Brains are altered by their ancestors not to rebel against the religious belief, not to question anything, not even to think intellectual, if this practice is followed for many years, this will led to extinction of unique thinkers, if Bruno didn't question against the religious belief we wouldn't get the basic planet alignment theory, i believe that many humans felt or found many scientific or philosophical theories before it official published by a person but they feared that people wouldn't accept them because the theory may question the whole belief system of the people, it may rebel against the religion, whenever this kinds of things happen in specific place in specific time period, the rebels loses their 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE'. When we term basic human emotions as co-called 'sin', the world should be ready to face the extinction of interesting world. Why these people desire for other people's acceptance? These question always wonders me, i think it is because of psychological evolution of humans, we live as a clan in the clan we need some indentity and little acceptance of other people in order to sustain a life in the clan. I always used to wonder why the religions created rules for humans not making them function independently as a human being, they do this because they want to control other people, why should these many people should die because someone wrote something which led to conflict between two groups, why should they fight in the name of god. Even though we humans all are different but we are same by the means of human life, you maybe white because you are evoluted in habitant, which demands for lighter skin color, the other person maybe dark because his ancestors evoluted in a habitant which demands a darker skin tone, but both are same in the means of human life, you as the same organs as the other person, then why sould we have conflict based on pseudoscientific belief. I believe in a monotheism, that's humanity. On the name of so-called 'sins' people are using it to control human beings, if humans didn't behave in humanly way rather they behave in way that will make them gain 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE' it will led to extinction of humanity, i am able to witness the events which support my theory, my observation is not a large scale observation, i observed the change in behaviour in my very own surroundings, the people's attitude towards everything,  I always believe that observation leads to greater innovation. 

Question everything around you, Socrates says that "ask more than you say" questioning will lead to new innovation, think for a minute what if Newton fails to question why the apple is attracted to the earth? Why the moon revolts around the earth? Why the planets revolts around the sun?, if his curious mind didn't observe the events and failed to question, we wouldn't get the term 'gravitation', but sooner of later some person will find it but he/she would have named it as anything else.

Directly or indirectly I have stated the significance and insignificance of the theory of 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE'

Whenever i state spritual journey people stereotype it with god, spritual journey is not communicating with the so-called man made gods, spritual journey is to find yourself, finding your inner soul a peaceful way to live, we need to accept the fact that we all going to die one day, accepting the uncertainty of life, realizing that we all suffer i.e. suffering is always inevitable. I think of replacing the word 'spritual journey' with 'philosophical journey' i think it is more appropriate. 

I hope you understood the difference. 

Stereotyping is the most tremendous and hazardous activity, there are people who read some books on communism and started praising it, I am not coming to state that praising communism is bad, I am coming to say that you should read everything, you should also read capitalism before you criticize capitalism in order of praising communism, you should not stereotype anything until and unless you understand the concept, you can declare that I don't like these philosophical ideas if you really read the whole concept. There are people who doesn't even spent time on analysing the philosophical idea rather they just listen to few people and they start stereotyping it.

Is this practise of 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE' is important? 

The most notorious person also has a good quality. In this chapter directly or indirectly saw the importance of this practice of 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE', but how it impacts as the whole society? The importance of this practice in the society i.e. the necessity of the practice of 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE' in the society? We'll see about it in following chapter.

Everthing is like a coin it has two sides, one will the favourable side, the other unfavourable, we need to accept that the world is the composition of good and bad, but i believe nothing is good nor bad, the things you termed 'unfavourable' in our country perhaps a widely accepted practice in another country, 'good' or 'bad' it is created my humans, for people who speaks only good words speaking abusive language will be considered as 'bad', the defination of 'good' or 'bad' is given by the person or whole as a society, you may define it in one way, i may define it in another way, the defination changes the perspective changes according to the society you belong to, if the society consider this or that as 'good' in order to gain 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE' you will become this or that, i suggest people to behave in the way they like them, but we should also consider the impotance of law because most of the people doesn't understand the way to behave, they doesn't understand the importance of anything, law plays a role of guidelines to people on the way to be. I didn't totally reject the idea of being independent or depended, rebels are also the part of society, if you question the long term belief of the society like Bruno, Darwin, Galileo, Nietzsche and many people did you are the part of the society, i consider it as an important part because these are the people who change the society, who pushes the humanity forward, it will take time to understand them, to realize their importance, they are termed as people ahead their time. Modifiing and advancing the society is also the part of society, but this part will not be appreciated sooner, i will take some time to get appreciated, but mostly these people are celebreted long after their permanent absense from this world, that's why they are known as 'people ahead of their time'. These rebellions who are not accepted by this society, due to the absense of 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE' they psychologically traumatised, few are also tribulated by the members of the society, as whole earth is earth, there is divisions as country of continent, we are one who divided it into countries, we are the one who claims ownership for the land, we are the one who says it is my land and you shoud not enter it, when the earth is created all the land is same, nothing belongs to anyone, everyone is human, once the whole clan lived in Africa, we migrated from place to place, and we evolved according to the surroundings we lived in, we changed the skin tone, and now we argue that we are not equal, we argue that i am the great, the fact is no one is greater than anyone, everybody is human. These borders are created by humans, the ownership over lands are myth, nothing is permanent in human life. I think sooner or later any country will propose the idea of 'one earth, one country' perhaps anyone would have already proposed this idea, let me get knowledge by you people, let me know in the comments. If they already proposed or not, let us ask for it. I am sure that many of you may have felt the same as i do, but we are scared to express it, don't be scared anymore. When we think deeply that why many people are scared to express because the process of rejecting the socially accepted practice i.e. revolving against the society will make them lose their 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE'. Throw away this thought from your mind nothing will change if you lose 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE'. Many inventions and theories came to the world little late because the people are scared to revolt against the society but there are also people who revolted against the social belief, they are the people who moved the society forward, but while these legends were existing people laughed at their theories and inventions, later after their permenent absense from this universe people understood their importance, Kafka is a best example his works became famous long after his died, he told his friend to burn all the manuscripts he wrote but his friend denied it and published it after his dead, i am an alternative historical fiction kind of a person, i think if 'this' thing happened instead of 'that' thing, it gives a complete different result, the result will be completely opposite to the world we live in, like 'WHAT IF?' kind of person. Let's think it in a different way, what if Kakfa's friend burned his manuscripts, we would not get many greatest literature masterpieces, we would not came to know about the existence of a intelligent writer. That's why the small events happen in this world matters a lot when it becomes a history, i am thinking of writing an alternative historical stories, like changing a small thing happened in the history and changing the the whole future, it will be like a historical philosophical science fiction story, it will be a short story, comment your thoughts.

Myself i also being a person who literally desires for 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE' but people learn from experience, it didn't take much time to realize 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE' doesn't matter a lot the fact is lot of insignificance than significance, you may question why am i praising revolting against 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE'? I praise it because i seen the life of desiring for 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE', the traumatic and chaotic life, but sooner i learned what is the drawbacks of this practice.  

The curious minds of the readers will be fed up in the following chapters, in next chapter we'll discuss about why do people desire for 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE'. 

 

Chapter 5: Why do people desire for 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE':-

The acceptance from the society acts like a fuel for humans, that's why they desire for 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE'. A society is a group of people participating in continuous social connection, or a broad social group occupying the same social or spatial territory, normally exposed to the same political power and cultural standards that are dominant. 

Have you ever wondered why we live as a society rather than praising individualism? We live as a society because humans always seeks other humans connection, but the one I couldn't understand is why we desire for human connection, perhaps it's the way we evolved, our brains or the most appropriate word to use our inner psychological structure evolved in a way that we desire for human acceptance. The fact is we can only make assumptions based on our understanding.

As I already stated a society is a group of people participating in continuous social connection, or a broad social group occupying the same social or spatial territory, normally exposed to the same political power and cultural standards that are dominant. We are made to depend on others for help each other, will a person will support you if you question the socially accepted fact, indeed they'll not accept you, this what happened to many people like Bruno. When Bruno proposed 'Heliocentrism' people didn't accept him because during that period all the people believed The geocentric model. 

There are people who does things for 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE', later they realize that they have lost their self.

I always argues that for an artist recognition is important while they are alive, but there are artist who are celebrated long after their permanent absence from this world.

We live in the world full of people who desire for 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE' but the fact is we can't change it. Desires are the reason for many problems in life, when a person desires the person will definately needs to face many problems, wheather you are in a great position in life or youi are in a worst phrase of life you'll definately suffer i.e. suffering is always inevitable, then why should we desire for 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE' even if we gain 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE' we are going to suffer in life, the life will be painful.

Humans uses techniques, they betray others, they have vehemence on others, in order to go greater in life, and it's human nature we can't deny it. We humans always wants to be great in life, they deny living a life they like because the life they like might not be a life which is concerned as 'great', it's a life which fails them to gain 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE'. Having a normal life and doing what they like is the most toughed way to live because people from all the sides except you to become they consider few things as 'normal', which everyone should do this makes you gain 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE' but most of the time you will not like the life you live, if you try to revolt against them they execute you from their society and term you as 'outsider' but the fact is 'outsiders' are the people who moves society forward.

I think the most appropriate reason why people desire for 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE' is that we evolved in that way and we didn't learn to revolt against socially accepted customs. 

The motive of this chapter is to make you understand why do people desire for 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE'? 

I may promote revolting against 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE' but we can't deny a fact that we are unable to accomplish it completely because it unconsciously became of prominent part of human psychological structure but the only thing we can do is that realizing that everything around you is a illusion created by people. Did you ever thought what if people from ancient times interchanged the context of 'good' and 'bad', now in our time we term few things as 'Good' an few 'Bad' what if it has interchanged long back, it would have changed the way we look at things, that's the reason why i state that everything us is a illusion created by humans. By considering this idea i can also state that desire is also an illusion. That's why i state that desires will cause you problems. When you heartily desire for something in your life you should also realize that there are lot of chance of losing it, that's why i advise people not to stay too emotionally connected to anything in life, everything in life is temporary you can't asure that everything you desire for will accompany your life forever, i am not promoting that living without desire is the best way to live, if you live with desire asure that you don't connect too emotionally to anything and make yourself ready to live without the desire fulfilling, the fact is everything around us is an illusion created by people the people didn't get any appropriate reason to make us follow that so take the practice of 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE' which is also an another illusion, if you follow what they say you will earn some acceptance from them and i saw many people who are addicted to 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE' sooner they started losing theirselves, the desire of earning 'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE' made them believe this illusion. If from the starting you believe in this illusion their is no problem at all, the problem starts when you realize the truth, once you realize the truth, once you get into the philosophical journey there's no way to live a normal life again.

Chapter 6: Conclusion:-

In this blog i have expressed the philosophical theory i.e. THE THEORY OF SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE. I want to ensure that this theory is my view about life. This theory may have few influences of any other philosophers.

In this blog i have expressed my frustration because of this society. I go on reading philosophies and i will do it forever. This blog is filled with everything i read and felt. I have observed everything around me, you may have felt same as me, we may have same ideology towards some topic.

'SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE' is an important and prominent part of human life, which we can't deny.

Whatever i want to tell to this world about this theory i had already stated. You may not understand why i felt like this about this world but one day you will understand and i didn't write this blog so you can understand me, i wrote this blog because i want to express my philosophy. 

I don't want to drag this conclusion part. This is not a conclusion for this theory, i will definitely use this theory in my future works with more clarity.  

About my next blog

My next blog's topic will be decided sooner. Maybe it will be a short story or any other topic which will be decided sonner.

I'm planning to publish it by new year of 2025

Ways to contact me 

Email: logavarshan0001@gmail.com

Instagram;- i.am.logavarshan.17211_bookism.

 

Thank you everyone for spending your precious time on my writing.